Unisex · #16,460 in 2026

Courtenay

Current Rank
#16,460
Peak Rank
#1,320 (1966)
Total Babies
1K
5-Yr Trend
Stable
👧 Girl peak #1,320 (1K total)
👦 Boy peak #2,284 (246 total)
👧As Girl Name
1925
First Year
2005
Last Year
1966
Peak Year
#1320
Peak Rank
1K
Total Count
52
Years Active
👦As Boy Name
1915
First Year
1993
Last Year
1980
Peak Year
#2284
Peak Rank
246
Total Count
28
Years Active

The Story of Courtenay

As a girl name

Courtenay first appeared in U.S. Social Security Administration records as a girl name in 1925, with 5 babies given the name that year. Its peak popularity came in 1966, when 67 Courtenays were born — ranking #1,320 that year. As of 2026, Courtenay ranks #16,460 for girls with 5 births, with steady use. In total, more than 1K Courtenays have been born in the U.S. since records began in 1880, spanning the 1920s through the 2020s.

As a boy name

Courtenay first appeared in U.S. Social Security Administration records as a boy name in 1915, with 6 babies given the name that year. Its peak popularity came in 1980, when 22 Courtenays were born — ranking #2,284 that year. As of 2026, Courtenay ranks #6,813 for boys with 7 births, with steady use. In total, more than 246 Courtenays have been born in the U.S. since records began in 1880, spanning the 1910s through the 2020s.

Popularity Over Time

Girls Boys

Popularity by State

ME
WA
MT
ND
MN
WI
MI
NY
VT
NH
MA
OR
ID
SD
IA
IL
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
NV
WY
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
DC
UT
CO
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
AK
AZ
NM
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
HI
TX
FL
Top 10
11-50
51-100
101-500
500+
No data

Names that sound like Courtenay

Phonetically similar names — useful when Courtenay is the vibe but a different syllable count or letter feel might suit better. Linked entries have a profile on Peek a Name.

Source: Datamuse . Phonetic similarity ranking, not curated.

Frequently Asked Questions about Courtenay

What does the name Courtenay mean?
Courtenay is a girl's name that has been used in U.S. records since 1925. Behind the Name doesn't list a specific etymology, but the name has remained in use across multiple decades.
How popular is Courtenay in 2026?
In 2026, Courtenay ranks #16,460 among girls' names in the U.S., with 5 babies given the name that year.
When was Courtenay most popular?
Courtenay reached its peak popularity in 1966, ranking #1,320 that year with 67 babies given the name.
In which U.S. states is Courtenay most popular?
Courtenay has historically been most popular in District of Columbia, Virginia, Missouri. Rankings vary year to year, but these states show the strongest concentration of births named Courtenay.
Is Courtenay a unisex name?
Yes — Courtenay is used for both girls and boys in U.S. records, with about 83% of Courtenays assigned female and 17% assigned male historically.
What names go well with Courtenay?
Names that share a similar style or popularity range with Courtenay include Clarita, Edia, Mischelle. These pairings are based on rank proximity and naming era in U.S. data.

About the name Courtenay

Courtenay is a unisex baby name tracked by the U.S. Social Security Administration. It first appeared in SSA records in 1925 and has accumulated 1K births in the dataset. Courtenay's peak popularity came in 1966 when it ranked #1,320. Use the chart and map above to compare Courtenay's trajectory across years and U.S. states, or browse the related names section to discover similar choices.

Continue exploring

Data sources

  • Birth statistics (counts, ranks, years 1880–2026) — U.S. Social Security Administration . Predictions for years not yet released by SSA are computed by Peek a Name from historical trends; we update with official data as soon as it ships.
  • Etymology, cultural origins, and related forms — Behind the Name (used under their public API terms).
  • Meaning prose and editorial summary — Wikipedia article extracts, licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 .
  • Predicted nationality distribution — Nationalize.io .
  • Phonetically similar names — Datamuse .

Peek a Name aggregates and presents the above data for informational purposes. Statistical predictions and external attributions are clearly labelled where shown; we make no guarantee of accuracy beyond what each source provides.