ESC 

Name Rank Total 

Searching... 

No names found 

Try searching for: Emma, Liam, Olivia, Noah...

1906

First Year

2021

Last Year

2013

Peak Year

#7537

Peak Rank

135

Total Count

21

Years Active

📖

## The Story of Field

The earliest SSA record of Field as a baby boy name dates back to 1906, when 5 babies received it. 2013 was its biggest year on record, with 10 newborns named Field — #7,537 in the national rankings. The 2010s were its strongest decade, accounting for roughly 39% of all recorded Fields. Its most recent appearance in the national data came in 2021 (8 births); the name has since faded from the published rankings. In total, more than 135 Fields have been born in the U.S. since records began in 1880, spanning the 1900s through the 2020s.

## Popularity Over Time

## Popularity by State

ME

WA

MT

ND

MN

WI

MI

NY

VT

NH

MA

OR

ID

SD

IA

IL

IN

OH

PA

NJ

CT

RI

CA

NV

WY

NE

MO

KY

WV

VA

MD

DE

DC

UT

CO

KS

AR

TN

NC

SC

AK

AZ

NM

OK

LA

MS

AL

GA

HI

TX

FL

Top 10

11-50

51-100

101-500

500+

No data

🎶

## Names that sound like Field

Phonetically similar names — useful when Field is the vibe but a different syllable count or letter feel might suit better. Linked entries have a profile on Peek a Name. 

* Feild
* Fold
* Filled
* Failed
* Fooled
* Filed
* Feld
* Felled
* Foiled
* Fouled
* Fulled
* Fuld

Source: [Datamuse ](https://www.datamuse.com/api/). Phonetic similarity ranking, not curated. 

❓

## Frequently Asked Questions about Field

What does the name Field mean?

Field is a boy's name that has been used in U.S. records since 1906\. Behind the Name doesn't list a specific etymology, but the name has remained in use across multiple decades.

How popular is Field in 2026?

In 2026, Field ranks #8,823 among boys' names in the U.S., with 8 babies given the name that year.

When was Field most popular?

Field reached its peak popularity in 2013, ranking #7,537 that year with 10 babies given the name.

Is Field a unisex name?

In U.S. Social Security records, Field is primarily a boy's name. We don't have meaningful data for it as a girl's name.

What names go well with Field?

Names that share a similar style or popularity range with Field include Rawson, Imon, Reddick. These pairings are based on rank proximity and naming era in U.S. data.

## Similar Names

[👦RawsonPeak #7537](/rawson)[👦ImonPeak #7537](/imon)[👦ReddickPeak #7537](/reddick)[👦BretleyPeak #7537](/bretley)[👦TavitaPeak #7537](/tavita)[👦JerrianPeak #7537](/jerrian)[👦RoreyPeak #7537](/rorey)[👦PrinstonPeak #7537](/prinston)

## About the name Field 

Field is a boy baby name tracked by the U.S. Social Security Administration. It first appeared in SSA records in 1906 and has accumulated 135 births in the dataset. Field's peak popularity came in 2013 when it ranked #7,537\. Use the chart and map above to compare Field's trajectory across years and U.S. states, or browse the related names section to discover similar choices.

### Continue exploring 

* [ Top names of 2013 → ](/year/2013)
* [ Names of the 2010s → ](/decade/2010s)
* [ Names starting with "F" → ](/letter/f)
* [ Browse all boy names → ](/names/boys)
* [ Top names of 2026 → ](/year/2026)

Data sources

* Birth statistics (counts, ranks, years 1880–2026) — U.S. [Social Security Administration ](https://www.ssa.gov/oact/babynames/). Predictions for years not yet released by SSA are computed by Peek a Name from historical trends; we update with official data as soon as it ships.
* Etymology, cultural origins, and related forms — [Behind the Name ](https://www.behindthename.com/) (used under their public API terms).
* Meaning prose and editorial summary — [Wikipedia ](https://en.wikipedia.org/) article extracts, licensed under [CC BY-SA 3.0 ](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/).
* Predicted nationality distribution — [Nationalize.io ](https://nationalize.io/).
* Phonetically similar names — [Datamuse ](https://www.datamuse.com/api/).

Peek a Name aggregates and presents the above data for informational purposes. Statistical predictions and external attributions are clearly labelled where shown; we make no guarantee of accuracy beyond what each source provides.